This is bullshit. Freespeech exists! Fascists are bullies with dog whistles who need their asses kicked.
If you dont think the 14th ammendment enumerates gay marriage then you are a fucking idiot
Emerged at Sea 🤔 Not where we're supposed to be! (Ucc? I am an activist in good standing. On this Land some call America. My Duty Status is Active. Objective is Protection of the Oppressed, Widow, Child and Disabled ! Charged with eliminate, expell the oppressor. Goals for control have taken there toll. We're lifting the shades for all to see! Land nor sea will cover thee!! Resolution Now Let's Talk of what is to be!! This Land , these people are ment to be Free!! From this ungodly (((++????Corpratocracy????)))) 400 million Votes (split) between 2 Coats? (((( Emerge at Sea))) Do you have One Corporation that has Two Sub Corporations (let's call them parties) That Pick those smart and conniving enough to fool everyone into believing they voted for our beast! So the sub Corporation Democrat Select their 3 best chances and the sub Corporation Republican picks their best 3!! Now Remember they are working for the same Corporation!!!! So did the best man/woman on America Become President?? Now Look at a Corporate Charter!!! The main objective is Profits ( Dividend) for the Shareholders!!! So these Shareholders receive a Dividend Quarterly!!! When did you Receive Yours??? Oh you still think your in a Constitutional Republic!!!!! You are a Corporation and have been since 1871 do your research then do it Again!!!! We need a Remedy! Resolution ? (Pollcast,) national, Peaceful Protest¿ (Paid Goons) will Jack that Yup!!! Remember they have unlimited funding!!! ( To pay your friend family) Suppose? Propose? (Surrender) absorb all assets assuring social safety net! ((We Need Our Best 100 Economic Strategist)) Existing Active Military Officers, Enlisted and Reserves are to fulfill their contracts. Established Pensions are to be honored! Existing Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare and (?) Benefits Paid! State and Local employee pensions are the secured through the federal Corporation? If so we must unbind them restoring States Rights ! We Need as Many Examples of Existing non Biased Documented
He has a good plan! take heroin(and all drugs) away from the drug dealers… Legalize all drugs!
This guy illuminates the gap between the reality on the ground and some illusion born by his generation.
I think it was a crisis when we had a supreme court justice declare that the Constitution is a living, breathing, document. It's meaning doesn't change with the times, it's codified law.
interested in where this Judge comes down on civil rights black population specifically and criminal justice system as a whole and individuals states like Texas and Pennsylvania or California?
How depressing that we got Kennedy in lieu of this guy!
He seems to ignore the 9th amendment when it comes to individual rights and talks about enumerated rights like the 1st amendment, yet the 9th amendment was put in to remind people that the enumerated rights aren't the only natural rights people have. If originalism is an excuse to not recognize any rights that aren't enumerated then it does not seem in line with libertarianism.
Great video, thanks for posting
You didn't have a constitutional crisis in your lifetime? BS There are so many ongoing violations of the US constitution just read article 1 section 8 for a brisk start how about the absurd ruling on interstate commerce? The Federal Reserve the IRS etcetera ad nauseam.
Venezuela? And they “failed” as a socialist state unrelated to our market attacks upon that state? Our vicious “sanctions” and seizures of their bank accounts have had no effect upon their economic state? Really? JWC
Jesus Christ! He admits that we are in an “Administrative State” and gives the figure of 19 to 1 laws made by bureaucrats instead of duly elected representatives! And yet there has “never been a Constitutional in his lifetime?! With such a softy bordered set of criterion the nation would be openly Fascist or Communist before he would react! And he’s on the High Court? And he’s an “originalist?” If he is, just what does he use to define its opposite?! Jesus!
The constitution doesn’t give us our rights. Our rights come from our creator. The first amendment was included in the constitution almost as an afterthought because even though the founding fathers understood it to be an inalienable right, they knew it would only be a matter of time before government would betray us. Hence the second amendment so that we retain the inalienable right to self preservation and to resist tyranny.
Government has been allowed to flip the enumerated powers from “can do nothing except that which is enumerated” to mean “can do anything not explicitly prohibited”.
That’s the crux of our constitutional crisis. Congress is a massive usurper, and has delegated unlawful authority to the executive branch bureaucracy which is creating regulations with the force of law. This in turn has led to legislative tyranny.
Surprised by Ginsberg stating legalizing cannabis “to be a more complex question than I had thought”. As an originalist, one would expect him to say “it’s not an inalienable right to dictate what sovereign individuals are allowed to consume, so the authority cannot be delegated to government.”
Paraphrased from Ginsburg: "With marijuana competition the big drug pushers got pushed out of that market into heroin. So we have more heroin addicts." Really? They weren't selling heroin before? And people switched from MJ to heroin cause what? Customer loyalty? For the most part I like Ginsburg but this rationale is like "It's against federal law therefore it must be harmful." At least until it gets repealed.
The Act of 1871, changed everything, in particular the original July 4, 1776, "Constitution for the united states for America".
The irony…
"When did orginalism start?"
…..uhhhh the late 1700s? lol
♥️✝️♥️
12:10 actually I push back on originalism (at least Scalia’s kind) bc often times the people who champion it are often rabidly religiously conservative. So take the 14th amendment’s equal protection and due process clauses. They’ll say that that provision strictly applies only to matters of race (particularly of black Americans) and to nothing else. So if you have a facially irrational and unequal law, such as homosexual conduct statutes, they’ll still say those are constitutional because that matter wasn’t considered nor tolerable at the time of ratification.
I would rather the text of the constitutional law be observed, not antiquated notions nor ideological/religious agendas.
And I have to disagree with him on Obergefell, again. 5th amendment’s guarantee of liberty and the 14th amendment’s guarantee of equal protection are pretty clear and even the constitution itself recognised that not all rights are or can be enumerated. Those two notions taken in conjunction ought to mean that Obergefell was correctly decided.
Unfortunately the constitution is not idiot proof. At the end of the day if everyone chooses to ignore the law it doesn't really matter how hypothetically idiot proof the system is. Practice and hypothesis are different animals.
Nick! I was waiting for your question about whether the drug schedule is constitutional or not… But you failed to ask it!
This is the absolute best thing I've watched in quite a while. It got a little QVC A at the end, but they played it off well.
There are some assertions in this video about the Constitution that are just flat out wrong
I learned a new word today! YAY https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicameralism
This is bullshit. Freespeech exists! Fascists are bullies with dog whistles who need their asses kicked.
If you dont think the 14th ammendment enumerates gay marriage then you are a fucking idiot
Emerged at Sea 🤔 Not where we're supposed to be! (Ucc?
I am an activist in good standing. On this Land some call America. My Duty Status is Active. Objective is Protection of the Oppressed, Widow, Child and Disabled ! Charged with eliminate, expell the oppressor.
Goals for control have taken there toll. We're lifting the shades for all to see! Land nor sea will cover thee!! Resolution Now Let's Talk of what is to be!! This Land , these people are ment to be Free!! From this ungodly (((++????Corpratocracy????))))
400 million Votes (split) between 2 Coats? (((( Emerge at Sea)))
Do you have One Corporation that has Two Sub Corporations (let's call them parties) That Pick those smart and conniving enough to fool everyone into believing they voted for our beast! So the sub Corporation Democrat Select their 3 best chances and the sub Corporation Republican picks their best 3!! Now Remember they are working for the same Corporation!!!!
So did the best man/woman on America Become President??
Now Look at a Corporate Charter!!! The main objective is Profits ( Dividend) for the Shareholders!!! So these Shareholders receive a Dividend Quarterly!!! When did you Receive Yours???
Oh you still think your in a Constitutional Republic!!!!!
You are a Corporation and have been since 1871 do your research then do it Again!!!!
We need a Remedy! Resolution ? (Pollcast,) national,
Peaceful Protest¿ (Paid Goons) will Jack that Yup!!!
Remember they have unlimited funding!!! ( To pay your friend family)
Suppose? Propose? (Surrender) absorb all assets assuring social safety net!
((We Need Our Best 100 Economic Strategist))
Existing Active Military Officers, Enlisted and Reserves are to fulfill their contracts. Established Pensions are to be honored!
Existing Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare and (?) Benefits Paid!
State and Local employee pensions are the secured through the federal Corporation? If so we must unbind them restoring States Rights !
We Need as Many Examples of Existing non Biased Documented
He has a good plan! take heroin(and all drugs) away from the drug dealers… Legalize all drugs!
This guy illuminates the gap between the reality on the ground and some illusion born by his generation.
I think it was a crisis when we had a supreme court justice declare that the Constitution is a living, breathing, document. It's meaning doesn't change with the times, it's codified law.
interested in where this Judge comes down on civil rights black population specifically and criminal justice system as a whole and individuals states like Texas and Pennsylvania or California?
How depressing that we got Kennedy in lieu of this guy!
He seems to ignore the 9th amendment when it comes to individual rights and talks about enumerated rights like the 1st amendment, yet the 9th amendment was put in to remind people that the enumerated rights aren't the only natural rights people have. If originalism is an excuse to not recognize any rights that aren't enumerated then it does not seem in line with libertarianism.
Great video, thanks for posting
You didn't have a constitutional crisis in your lifetime? BS There are so many ongoing violations of the US constitution just read article 1 section 8 for a brisk start how about the absurd ruling on interstate commerce? The Federal Reserve the IRS etcetera ad nauseam.
Venezuela? And they “failed” as a socialist state unrelated to our market attacks upon that state?
Our vicious “sanctions” and seizures of their bank accounts have had no effect upon their economic state?
Really? JWC
Jesus Christ! He admits that we are in an “Administrative State” and gives the figure of 19 to 1 laws made by bureaucrats instead of duly elected representatives! And yet there has “never been a Constitutional in his lifetime?!
With such a softy bordered set of criterion the nation would be openly Fascist or Communist before he would react!
And he’s on the High Court?
And he’s an “originalist?” If he is, just what does he use to define its opposite?! Jesus!
The constitution doesn’t give us our rights. Our rights come from our creator. The first amendment was included in the constitution almost as an afterthought because even though the founding fathers understood it to be an inalienable right, they knew it would only be a matter of time before government would betray us. Hence the second amendment so that we retain the inalienable right to self preservation and to resist tyranny.
Government has been allowed to flip the enumerated powers from “can do nothing except that which is enumerated” to mean “can do anything not explicitly prohibited”.
That’s the crux of our constitutional crisis. Congress is a massive usurper, and has delegated unlawful authority to the executive branch bureaucracy which is creating regulations with the force of law. This in turn has led to legislative tyranny.
Surprised by Ginsberg stating legalizing cannabis “to be a more complex question than I had thought”. As an originalist, one would expect him to say “it’s not an inalienable right to dictate what sovereign individuals are allowed to consume, so the authority cannot be delegated to government.”
Paraphrased from Ginsburg: "With marijuana competition the big drug pushers got pushed out of that market into heroin. So we have more heroin addicts." Really? They weren't selling heroin before? And people switched from MJ to heroin cause what? Customer loyalty? For the most part I like Ginsburg but this rationale is like "It's against federal law therefore it must be harmful." At least until it gets repealed.
The Act of 1871, changed everything, in particular the original July 4, 1776, "Constitution for the united states for America".
The irony…
"When did orginalism start?"
…..uhhhh the late 1700s? lol
♥️✝️♥️
12:10 actually I push back on originalism (at least Scalia’s kind) bc often times the people who champion it are often rabidly religiously conservative. So take the 14th amendment’s equal protection and due process clauses. They’ll say that that provision strictly applies only to matters of race (particularly of black Americans) and to nothing else. So if you have a facially irrational and unequal law, such as homosexual conduct statutes, they’ll still say those are constitutional because that matter wasn’t considered nor tolerable at the time of ratification.
I would rather the text of the constitutional law be observed, not antiquated notions nor ideological/religious agendas.
And I have to disagree with him on Obergefell, again. 5th amendment’s guarantee of liberty and the 14th amendment’s guarantee of equal protection are pretty clear and even the constitution itself recognised that not all rights are or can be enumerated. Those two notions taken in conjunction ought to mean that Obergefell was correctly decided.
Unfortunately the constitution is not idiot proof. At the end of the day if everyone chooses to ignore the law it doesn't really matter how hypothetically idiot proof the system is. Practice and hypothesis are different animals.
Nick! I was waiting for your question about whether the drug schedule is constitutional or not… But you failed to ask it!
This is the absolute best thing I've watched in quite a while. It got a little QVC A at the end, but they played it off well.