Like most laws it is a war against poor people period. If your poor color does not matter. Obama's daughter was caught but never charged. Not because of color but because of money and who she is. The rich either never get targeted or charged with it and when they do they get away with it most times. Poor people do not have the money to fight it and thus are the ones hurt by all these statutes and codes they call law, which lack due process of law and are not laws but color of law.
What they are really doing is trying to figure out how they can regulate it and make money off of it while restricting you to grow it and do the same. In short like most other things they do not want you to be able to grow it or make your own they want to force people to buy it from them and or pay them for the "privilege" to practice a right.
The Supreme Court has warned,
"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and codes–ordinances and Restrictions] on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance… [deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts]." (United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);….. u.c.c 1-308–formerly 1-207 title 18 us.c 241 and 242
A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law,) A concurrent or ‘joint resolution ‘of legislature is not “Law, ” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws.
“All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”
(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process[of law], in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.
Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw. 60 (1830). “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common (Natural) right and common reason are null and void.”
Hurtado v. United States, 410 US 578 (1973) “It is not every act, legislative in form, that is law. Law is something more than mere will exerted as an act of power…Arbitrary power, enforcing its edicts to the injury of the party and property of its subjects is not law.”
If a ex post facto law is void as soon as it is created, and it is, then how do you "legalize" something that was never illegal to begin with? What we need to do is arrest the officers and judges enforcing color of law for violation of oath of office which is treason and fraud. This is not a war on drugs it is a war on the people. It is the duty of anyone who takes a oath of office to refuse to obey or enforce color of law. These folks sit up there and project their crimes on others. they are the criminals many times the ones shipping it in in the first place.
The immoral and highly racist crusade against marijuana should have never been a thing in the first place. It was founded out of deceitful and racial fear mongering.
let the states make their own decisions , im sure a couple wont want cannabis , and im sure the states that elect not to have it will suffer economically and will notice a decrease in their respective population , henceforth they will realize they made a mistake but its ultimately the decision of the elected officials of the state. this is a no brainer. let our american states decide.
Legalize it in all 50 states "DAMN IT"
Nixon was a crook and a peace of shit he's the A-hole who make cannabis outlawed he did that to give it to us good people like the blanks and white hippies shame on you D*ckhead nickson you low life scumbag
Not one person has EVER DIED from cannabis use period!..
But guns and alcohol and tobacco has killed trillions but weed never has. Just legalize is and stop putting good people in jails
Racial disparity has nothing to do with it right is right and wrong is wrong cannabis is food food is medicine I TOLD YOU. With 100s OF LETTERS. It's very simple now stop promulgating more laws YOU GOVERNMENT ARE the TERRORIST. Plain as the NOSE on our FACES. Go do business or get jobs in the Private sector this is the remedy for the sickness that you have Created in OUR LANDS.
We do not believe your LIES about ANYTHING. Go sell your over seas DOPE and leave our people the HELL ALONE we will GOVERN OUR SELVES as FREE MEN!
Thanks Man
When are we the AMERICAN CITIZENS are going to find the outcome of this debate?
Set the legal age to buy, THC in blood limit to be able to drive vehicles, police tests to test the actual THC levels like alcohol breathalyzers do, penalties for selling to underage, etc. and is all good to go, easy
I read that 66% of Americans want the cannabis to be legalized federally so my guess is it will pass
Racial justice, is that what we're calling tax money these days?
I don’t hear anything
Many Libertarians, Conservatives, Independents, and Democrats believe in personal liberty. When the rubber hits the road, your beliefs will be tested on this subject. If you say you believe in liberty, but won't even protect the right to ingest or refuse to ingest, foods, medicines, etc, then your cry of liberty is hollow. This is about far more than liberty to ingest cannabis, or other herbal medicines, it's about whether we the people are truly free, or not. We tell the world we are the greatest nation on earth. Time to prove it. "Give me liberty or give me death" wasn't just an ad campaign or a sound bite. It was a commitment to a way of life that elevates and validates that we the people are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Just out the woman at 59.00, high as fuck.
It’s a victimless crime and many times safer then alcohol, that is allowed to be advertised as a fun healthy beverage. It’s status on the CSA list is totally absurd.
FREE THE WEED! FREE THE WEED! FREE THE WEED!
damn she straight up cut off Burnett :/ wow, rude…
DOJ
https://www.facebook.com/Slydog1960/posts/2567596046618142
Like most laws it is a war against poor people period. If your poor color does not matter. Obama's daughter was caught but never charged. Not because of color but because of money and who she is. The rich either never get targeted or charged with it and when they do they get away with it most times. Poor people do not have the money to fight it and thus are the ones hurt by all these statutes and codes they call law, which lack due process of law and are not laws but color of law.
What they are really doing is trying to figure out how they can regulate it and make money off of it while restricting you to grow it and do the same. In short like most other things they do not want you to be able to grow it or make your own they want to force people to buy it from them and or pay them for the "privilege" to practice a right.
The Supreme Court has warned,
"Because of what appear to be Lawful commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and
codes–ordinancesand Restrictions] on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance… [deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts]." (United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);….. u.c.c 1-308–formerly 1-207 title 18 us.c 241 and 242A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law,)
A concurrent or ‘joint resolution ‘of legislature is not “Law,
” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws.
“All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”
(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process[of law], in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.
Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw. 60 (1830). “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common (Natural) right and common reason are null and void.”
Hurtado v. United States, 410 US 578 (1973) “It is not every act, legislative in form, that is law. Law is something more than mere will exerted as an act of power…Arbitrary power, enforcing its edicts to the injury of the party and property of its subjects is not law.”
If a ex post facto law is void as soon as it is created, and it is, then how do you "legalize" something that was never illegal to begin with? What we need to do is arrest the officers and judges enforcing color of law for violation of oath of office which is treason and fraud. This is not a war on drugs it is a war on the people. It is the duty of anyone who takes a oath of office to refuse to obey or enforce color of law. These folks sit up there and project their crimes on others. they are the criminals many times the ones shipping it in in the first place.
The immoral and highly racist crusade against marijuana should have never been a thing in the first place. It was founded out of deceitful and racial fear mongering.
let the states make their own decisions , im sure a couple wont want cannabis , and im sure the states that elect not to have it will suffer economically and will notice a decrease in their respective population , henceforth they will realize they made a mistake but its ultimately the decision of the elected officials of the state. this is a no brainer. let our american states decide.
Legalize it in all 50 states "DAMN IT"
Nixon was a crook and a peace of shit he's the A-hole who make cannabis outlawed he did that to give it to us good people like the blanks and white hippies shame on you D*ckhead nickson you low life scumbag
Not one person has EVER DIED from cannabis use period!..
But guns and alcohol and tobacco has killed trillions but weed never has. Just legalize is and stop putting good people in jails
Racial disparity has nothing to do with it right is right and wrong is wrong cannabis is food food is medicine I TOLD YOU. With 100s OF LETTERS. It's very simple now stop promulgating more laws YOU GOVERNMENT ARE the TERRORIST. Plain as the NOSE on our FACES. Go do business or get jobs in the Private sector this is the remedy for the sickness that you have Created in OUR LANDS.
We do not believe your LIES about ANYTHING. Go sell your over seas DOPE and leave our people the HELL ALONE we will GOVERN OUR SELVES as FREE MEN!
Thanks Man
When are we the AMERICAN CITIZENS are going to find the outcome of this debate?
Hearing begins at 29:23
Set the legal age to buy, THC in blood limit to be able to drive vehicles, police tests to test the actual THC levels like alcohol breathalyzers do, penalties for selling to underage, etc. and is all good to go, easy
I read that 66% of Americans want the cannabis to be legalized federally so my guess is it will pass
Racial justice, is that what we're calling tax money these days?
I don’t hear anything
Many Libertarians, Conservatives, Independents, and Democrats believe in personal liberty. When the rubber hits the road, your beliefs will be tested on this subject. If you say you believe in liberty, but won't even protect the right to ingest or refuse to ingest, foods, medicines, etc, then your cry of liberty is hollow. This is about far more than liberty to ingest cannabis, or other herbal medicines, it's about whether we the people are truly free, or not. We tell the world we are the greatest nation on earth. Time to prove it. "Give me liberty or give me death" wasn't just an ad campaign or a sound bite. It was a commitment to a way of life that elevates and validates that we the people are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Just out the woman at 59.00, high as fuck.
It’s a victimless crime and many times safer then alcohol, that is allowed to be advertised as a fun healthy beverage. It’s status on the CSA list is totally absurd.