The only make the quid pro quo is Joe Biden. And who knows most Democrats did the quid pro quo.
Adam Schiff you are such liar. Everything you said is absolutely lies. Everything you said you twisted the word or you manufactured President Trump phone call. Adam Schiff you are such a sore loser, you are such crooks,you are so corrupt all of radical democratic party. You are Parody mob.
It’s been two years since husband cheated. he has done everything he can to fix his mistake. I just can’t get over the fact some other girl was having sex with him while he was married to me. Two years and I still can’t stomach it. @redhackpro on instagram he was able to hack into my husband mobile phone, You can also send him a whatsapp messages +1 937-815-1491, or Email : hackprivate8@gmailcom he has changed. he has learned his lesson. What good is that now? All I see is a nasty slut who had a nasty girl on him with his penis in her.
Newton v. Insurance Co.
What stupid question from senator Graham!
Apparently working with or for this president is acting exactly as him.
1:17:23 Schiff tries to outsmart himself by making an analogy, making a complete ass of himself in the process.
@5:09:35: Schiff and Co keep saying "'White House' meeting that Z was 'Desperate for'." Seems like our own foreign diplomats were desperate for it, but Z's own words don't seem to indicate that. Z wanted A meeting, which he says it could be in Washington, Ukraine or Poland. If Z was desperate for a WH meeting, he would have said that in the phone call? Seems like this is just the House Mgrs use of terms to create a stronger argument.
As the House makes their case please know the same case could be made against President Obama. Actually, it could be made against every President in history.
imagine getting raped, and the accused can obstruct the witnesses from testifying, then majority of the jurors says its not obstruction. corruption in the open.
What I really want after the Question and Answer period is completed is for the Senate to vote to relieve the House Managers and thank them for their Articles, while letting them know that the Senate choses to proceed with the Impeachment Trial without their presence from here on out as the House of Representatives has completed its Constitutional duty.
TODAY THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DIED. 1/31/2020. THAT YOU ADAM SCHIFF AND NANCY PELOSI.
I think Sodium penathol is much more believable than a bunch of atheists under oath….
Each time yellow tie comes to the podium he gets more red than before.
Thank you Schiff for standing up for the people. The other side pretend to have no common sense!
Please note they are changing the narrative to…we know we can't get him out of office so…ANY DEMOCRAT WHO DOES NOT WIN IN NOVEMBER LOST DUE TO FRAUD AND CHEATING…
Screw you you pencil necked bug eyed dog humper…Adamskaya Schitenoff
@5:28:06: Something else to consider: Turley's response to Schiff regarding Obstruction & Abuse of Power previously " " George Washington University law professor and Republican legal scholar Jonathan Turley accused the House Judiciary Committee of “doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing,” during the impeachment hearing on Wednesday.
“Mr. Chairman, I testified before in front of you a few months ago, and if you recall, we had an exchange and I encouraged you to bring those actions, and I said I thought you would win,” declared Turley. “And you did. And I think it was an important win for this committee, because I don’t agree with President Trump’s argument in that case. But that’s an example of what can happen if you actually subpoena witnesses and go to court.”
“Then you have an obstruction case, because a court issues an order, and unless they stay that order by a higher court, you have obstruction,” he continued, adding, “But I can’t emphasize this enough and I’ll say it just one more time, if you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power.”
“It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing,” Turley proclaimed. “We have a third branch that deals with conflicts at the other two branches, and what comes out of there, what you do with it, is the very definition of legitimacy.”
I can't get my head around how these Demwits can hate someone so so so much, they really need to show some respect to the President, he was elected fair and square now let him have he's time at making America great just like he has.. Mark my words if any of these Demlunies were in power, America would be on eBay for sale.. TRUMP for POTUS 2020 (if you want a happy life and want to setup your childrens future)
It is the duty of the POTUS, as the Top Enforcer of our laws as provided for under the Constitution, to order an investigation into crimes or possible crimes (which include corruption), and the suspected corrupt dealings of the Bidens in the Ukraine are no exception. That is why Pres. Trump issued an Executive Order on Dec. 21, 2017 to address just that, and other human rights violations.
Democrats, CNN and Antifa clearing off the Pepto Bismol shelf.
WOW! After claiming for weeks that they, the Democrats, had "overwhelming" evidence against the President, then throughout the process of submitting their so-called evidence, persistently claiming that the President DID accept a quid pro quo, DID commit bribery, DID commit extortion, now they, the Democrats, are walking back all of those "DIDs" to being merely "circumstantial", i.e., that although The President didn't succeed in doing any of those "DIDs", he definitely INTENDED to do all of them, because they can see inside his head. Therefore he is STILL a problem and must be convicted !!! Yeah right. We get it. Can anyone believe these people are schooled lawyers out of a law school? Bush lawyers, more like. Watch from here: 9:14:24 . AND … No. Prof. Dershowitz did not say "..akin to a criminal violation". He said "… akin to a HIGH crime" – such as bribery and treason understood. Debating fabrications invented to self-serve, wastes everyone's time and shows no respect for the law, the Senate or we the people. This is sleazy legal argument, attempting to pervert the law. Watch from here: 9:31:34 .
Listen David duke said most Republicans and Democrats feel the same way he feels.
We'll see who feel the same as duke feel if they the house decide to let trump walk.
Then we will see who's the members that are inside the house. Trump get impeach it will be justice for all.
For Jesus Christ's sake, we must use protection with the Chosen One. no witnesses allowed
1312020 post comments when i turn on my computer for ladt three daus it came it said hyper link rigbt before i wrote this within ten minutes i heard a bero like it disconnected 1041am central time 1312020
At least Democrats agree with Republicans that it is the House which has the sole power to make the House Impeachment Rules as hammered by them here, [watch from 8:00:52 ], but beyond that all agreement stops. Apparently, Nancy Polosi is "the House", when she held a Press Conference announcing that she was instructing the Justice Committee to initiate Impeachment proceedings, but had not sought the vote of the House to authorize it. Apparently the Basement Bunker Committee which conducted these Hearings is the "the House", lthough only a handful of House Representatives sit on it. What do they think we are? As stoopid as they are to have even tried to pull this stunt? Everything they say is smoke and mirrors.
The Democrats' strategy is to advance ASSUMPTIONS as fact, that the President DID commit bribery, DID commit extortion, DID a quid pro quo, then throw up their hands in fake shock and awe, worthy of any Hollywood film set, gasping at how COULD the Republicans DARE to even ATTEMPT to argue for the Senate's rejection of their charges, with a final curtain call of how outrageous, how lawless these Republicans are. That'd be all very well if the Democrats ACTUALLY had evidence to show the President did these things. The Democrats have broken every rule in the book, have denied the President due process on four counts and now deny him the most fundamental and inalienable right of all, the right to the presumption of innocence. They're a disgrace.
It’s just like I said in the beginning: the impeachment will be acquitted, which is when liberals will then get all confused and mad saying “but I thought he was impeached!!”
3:05:30 This question and answer, demonstrates that the Demoncrats are perverts that just want to ridicule America and show the world our cookies.
The only make the quid pro quo is Joe Biden. And who knows most Democrats did the quid pro quo.
Adam Schiff you are such liar. Everything you said is absolutely lies. Everything you said you twisted the word or you manufactured President Trump phone call. Adam Schiff you are such a sore loser, you are such crooks,you are so corrupt all of radical democratic party. You are Parody mob.
It’s been two years since husband cheated. he has done everything he can to fix his mistake. I just can’t get over the fact some other girl was having sex with him while he was married to me. Two years and I still can’t stomach it. @redhackpro on instagram he was able to hack into my husband mobile phone, You can also send him a whatsapp messages +1 937-815-1491, or Email : hackprivate8@gmailcom he has changed. he has learned his lesson. What good is that now? All I see is a nasty slut who had a nasty girl on him with his penis in her.
Newton v. Insurance Co.
What stupid question from senator Graham!
Apparently working with or for this president is acting exactly as him.
1:17:23 Schiff tries to outsmart himself by making an analogy, making a complete ass of himself in the process.
@5:09:35: Schiff and Co keep saying "'White House' meeting that Z was 'Desperate for'."
Seems like our own foreign diplomats were desperate for it, but Z's own words don't seem to indicate that. Z wanted A meeting, which he says it could be in Washington, Ukraine or Poland. If Z was desperate for a WH meeting, he would have said that in the phone call? Seems like this is just the House Mgrs use of terms to create a stronger argument.
As the House makes their case please know the same case could be made against President Obama. Actually, it could be made against every President in history.
imagine getting raped, and the accused can obstruct the witnesses from testifying, then majority of the jurors says its not obstruction. corruption in the open.
What I really want after the Question and Answer period is completed is for the Senate to vote to relieve the House Managers and thank them for their Articles, while letting them know that the Senate choses to proceed with the Impeachment Trial without their presence from here on out as the House of Representatives has completed its Constitutional duty.
TODAY THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DIED. 1/31/2020.
THAT YOU ADAM SCHIFF AND NANCY PELOSI.
I think Sodium penathol is much more believable than a bunch of atheists under oath….
Each time yellow tie comes to the podium he gets more red than before.
Thank you Schiff for standing up for the people. The other side pretend to have no common sense!
Please note they are changing the narrative to…we know we can't get him out of office so…ANY DEMOCRAT WHO DOES NOT WIN IN NOVEMBER LOST DUE TO FRAUD AND CHEATING…
Screw you you pencil necked bug eyed dog humper…Adamskaya Schitenoff
@5:28:06: Something else to consider: Turley's response to Schiff regarding Obstruction & Abuse of Power previously "
" George Washington University law professor and Republican legal scholar Jonathan Turley accused the House Judiciary Committee of “doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing,” during the impeachment hearing on Wednesday.
“Mr. Chairman, I testified before in front of you a few months ago, and if you recall, we had an exchange and I encouraged you to bring those actions, and I said I thought you would win,” declared Turley. “And you did. And I think it was an important win for this committee, because I don’t agree with President Trump’s argument in that case. But that’s an example of what can happen if you actually subpoena witnesses and go to court.”
“Then you have an obstruction case, because a court issues an order, and unless they stay that order by a higher court, you have obstruction,” he continued, adding, “But I can’t emphasize this enough and I’ll say it just one more time, if you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power.”
“It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing,” Turley proclaimed. “We have a third branch that deals with conflicts at the other two branches, and what comes out of there, what you do with it, is the very definition of legitimacy.”
I can't get my head around how these Demwits can hate someone so so so much, they really need to show some respect to the President, he was elected fair and square now let him have he's time at making America great just like he has.. Mark my words if any of these Demlunies were in power, America would be on eBay for sale.. TRUMP for POTUS 2020 (if you want a happy life and want to setup your childrens future)
It is the duty of the POTUS, as the Top Enforcer of our laws as provided for under the Constitution, to order an investigation into crimes or possible crimes (which include corruption), and the suspected corrupt dealings of the Bidens in the Ukraine are no exception. That is why Pres. Trump issued an Executive Order on Dec. 21, 2017 to address just that, and other human rights violations.
Democrats, CNN and Antifa clearing off the Pepto Bismol shelf.
WOW! After claiming for weeks that they, the Democrats, had "overwhelming" evidence against the President, then throughout the process of submitting their so-called evidence, persistently claiming that the President DID accept a quid pro quo, DID commit bribery, DID commit extortion, now they, the Democrats, are walking back all of those "DIDs" to being merely "circumstantial", i.e., that although The President didn't succeed in doing any of those "DIDs", he definitely INTENDED to do all of them, because they can see inside his head. Therefore he is STILL a problem and must be convicted !!! Yeah right. We get it. Can anyone believe these people are schooled lawyers out of a law school? Bush lawyers, more like. Watch from here: 9:14:24 . AND … No. Prof. Dershowitz did not say "..akin to a criminal violation". He said "… akin to a HIGH crime" – such as bribery and treason understood. Debating fabrications invented to self-serve, wastes everyone's time and shows no respect for the law, the Senate or we the people. This is sleazy legal argument, attempting to pervert the law. Watch from here: 9:31:34 .
Listen David duke said most Republicans and Democrats feel the same way he feels.
We'll see who feel the same as duke feel if they the house decide to let trump walk.
Then we will see who's the members that are inside the house. Trump get impeach it will be justice for all.
For Jesus Christ's sake, we must use protection with the Chosen One. no witnesses allowed
1312020 post comments when i turn on my computer for ladt three daus it came it said hyper link rigbt before i wrote this within ten minutes i heard a bero like it disconnected 1041am central time 1312020
At least Democrats agree with Republicans that it is the House which has the sole power to make the House Impeachment Rules as hammered by them here, [watch from 8:00:52 ], but beyond that all agreement stops. Apparently, Nancy Polosi is "the House", when she held a Press Conference announcing that she was instructing the Justice Committee to initiate Impeachment proceedings, but had not sought the vote of the House to authorize it. Apparently the Basement Bunker Committee which conducted these Hearings is the "the House", lthough only a handful of House Representatives sit on it. What do they think we are? As stoopid as they are to have even tried to pull this stunt? Everything they say is smoke and mirrors.
The Democrats' strategy is to advance ASSUMPTIONS as fact, that the President DID commit bribery, DID commit extortion, DID a quid pro quo, then throw up their hands in fake shock and awe, worthy of any Hollywood film set, gasping at how COULD the Republicans DARE to even ATTEMPT to argue for the Senate's rejection of their charges, with a final curtain call of how outrageous, how lawless these Republicans are. That'd be all very well if the Democrats ACTUALLY had evidence to show the President did these things. The Democrats have broken every rule in the book, have denied the President due process on four counts and now deny him the most fundamental and inalienable right of all, the right to the presumption of innocence. They're a disgrace.
It’s just like I said in the beginning: the impeachment will be acquitted, which is when liberals will then get all confused and mad saying “but I thought he was impeached!!”
3:05:30 This question and answer, demonstrates that the Demoncrats are perverts that just want to ridicule America and show the world our cookies.